
The numbersbehind the snow.
These are planning numbers, built to show the idea works on paper. They use a sample northern Wasatch site because no site is chosen yet. A licensed feasibility study comes first and will refine all of it.
Transparent. Conservative.
Ticket prices are held flat for ten years while costs rise 3% a year. The estimate carries a $17.9M contingency. Full tables are in the PDF.
Stress-tested against a 25% drop in visits. A pre-sold season-pass base and a capital reserve keep the resort paying its bond.
It does not default.
Where the money comes from.
The full build is $104.19M. Phase 1, the opening-day build, is $83.9M. Here is how the $86.75M funding request covers it. Every line is a request. Nothing is secured.
A one-time investment.
Not a tax increase. The $60M state investment is a one-time cost paid from existing revenue. In the 2024-25 season alone, skiing generated $342.6M in state and local tax. The state share is less than one season of that, paid once.
The state already builds places to play.
Utah funds recreation at this scale regularly. The $60M state share here matches what the Legislature approved for the Bear Lake marina alone.
Approved by the Legislature for 31 state park, trail and recreation projects in two sessions. More than the full $104.19M cost of this project.1
State funding for Utah's Olympic facilities as of 2023, projected to pass $140M by 2028. Utah already invests in places to ski and train.3
Read the full summary.
Get the full tables, the ten-year model and the stress test. Or ask us anything.